|
Worst
Case Scenario
By
John Riley
Chief Strategist
07/15/08
What a year
- bank and brokerage failures, Federal bailouts, sub-prime mortgage
mess and a looming derivative disaster. What would happen if things
continue to unravel? What would that look like?
Runs
on the Banks
With the failure of IndyMac, we’ve already seen a run on a
bank force its closure. What if a few more banks had runs? Depositor
panic could cause runs at several banks that are on the edge of
failure. A run could push them over.
The FDIC is
spending about 10% of its reserves on bailing out IndyMac. How many
more depositors can they protect? And they aren’t making all
of the Indymac depositors whole, about 10,000 depositors had more
than 100,000 on deposit. The initial word from the FDIC is that
those depositors may only get 50 cents on the dollar for amounts
above $100,000.
Bank Index |
Sovereign
Bank |
Washington
Mutual |
Bank RI |
| We
are not suggesting any of these are about to fail. We are including
them to show how widespread the bear market in banks has been,
from local to regional to national. |
Brokerage
Failure (maybe more than one)
The failure of Bear Stearns should act as a warning to other brokerages
that are heavily invested in sub-prime mortgages and derivatives.
The Fed’s response was to give brokers access to an emergency
fund. Several large firms including Lehman, Merrill and Goldman
have had to utilize these funds. Yet their stocks continue to tumble
as losses mount. Which will be next?
Fed Chairman
Bernanke, for all his “wisdom”, has already announced
that he expects to see another brokerage fail before the end of
the year. Will the Fed set up another emergency fund? Will there
be more bail-outs? Did the last one help?
Brokerage
Index |
Lehman
Brothers |
Morgan
Stanley |
Merrill
Lynch |
UBS PaineWebber
|
Legg Mason
|
| Like
the banks, brokers have been in a severe bear market of their
own making. Sub-prime and derivatives have created a toxic cocktail.
With some brokers down over 60% it is anybody's guess where
the bottom will be and which ones will survive. |
Mortgage
Giants Fail
According to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s own year end statements
for 2007, they have less than 2 cents of assets for every dollar
of mortgage and debt liability. Former Fed Governor William Poole
has said that the two are already insolvent, based on certain accounting
methods.
We’ve
already seen the Fed’s “bail-out” of Fannie and
Freddie, if you can call it that. It is no more than letting them
borrow more money to solve a problem of borrowing too much money.
Fannie Mae |
Freddie
Mac |
CountryWide |
National
City |
| Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac were supposed to handle the best quality
mortgages. They don't look any better off than the sub-prime
lenders like Countrywide and National City. |
A Derivative
Calamity
We’ve seen how much the major banks have in these esoteric
instruments. (Trillion
Dollar Secret) The failure of Barings Bank and Long Term Capital
(LTC) shows the damage they can do when they go bad.
Former Fed Chairman
Alan Greenspan testified that the reason the Fed bailed out LTC
was to prevent a collapse of the US economic system. LTC’s
bailout was only a billion dollars. JP Morgan, Citibank and BankAmerica
combined have over $150 trillion in derivatives. Yes, TRILLION.
JP Morgan has
assets backing up their derivatives of only 1.56%. By comparison,
Citi and BankAmerica are solid as rocks with a whopping 3.57% and
3.43% respectively.
Notional
Amount of Derivatives 1st Quarter 2008 |
. |
Total
Assets |
Total
Derivatives |
Asset/Derivative
Ratio |
| JP Morgan |
$
1.40 trillion |
$
89.99 trillion |
1.56% |
| BankAmerica |
$
1.33 trillion |
$
37.94 trillion |
3.57% |
| Citibank |
$
1.29 trillion |
$
37.69 trillion |
3.43% |
| Wachovia |
$
.66 trillion |
$
4.88 trillion |
13.64% |
| HSBC |
|
$
4.28 trillion |
4.40% |
Source:
Comptroller of Currency Format: CIS |
Since derivatives
are not regulated, they are not marked to the market daily, so we
have no idea how much of a price swing their derivative portfolios
have. But given our knowledge of other markets, it is safe to assume
value changes of 1% to 2% are normal in any given week.
And since our
recent history tells us we should question the assets of banks,
can we really be sure of the value of JP Morgan’s assets?
Or Citibanks? Or BankAmerica? How much of their assets are non-performing?
How much are New England mortgages? How much are credit card balances?
If one of the
big three fail, what does the Fed do then? They don’t have
anywhere near enough money to bail them out. And because of the
counter-parties involved in derivatives, it is likely that the failure
of one party could lead to the failure of several others. This was
the concern with Bear Stearns, and why the Fed acted so quickly.
But Bear was no where near the size of a JP Morgan or Citibank.
Increase
in Derivative Portfolios past 12 months |
| JP Morgan |
27.08% |
| CitiBank |
25.35% |
| BankAmerica |
32.95% |
| With
everything that has happened in the past year, these banks
continued to pile on these risky investments. |
Source:
Comptroller of Currency Format: CIS |
Concentration
of Derivatives |
| Top 5
banks |
96.90% |
| All other
banks |
3.10% |
Source:
Comptroller of Currency Format: CIS |
A Banking
Holiday
Let’s continue down this dark road a bit further and assume
the worst has happened and the Fed is forced to contain the economic
disaster by declaring a banking holiday. It is not as much fun as
it sounds. Banks are closed until they can prove their solvency
and with the continued decline in real estate, this gets harder
and harder for banks.
Recent history
with the S&L crisis of the late 80’s and the failure of
RISDIC in RI in 1990, shows how our automated lives can work against
us. In 1990, payroll check kept getting direct deposited into failed
S&Ls in RI. It took weeks to stop the system and employees had
no recourse or access to their paychecks. Automatic mortgage payments
weren’t processed. ATMs didn’t work.
If the Fed called
a banking holiday, it is very likely they would also close the stock
and bond markets in the US, similar to after 9/11. Maybe they would
be closed for a week to help calm things down.
But overseas
markets would still be open and it is very likely that the Dollar
would collapse, commodities and gold would skyrocket and foreign
markets would tumble. When the US Markets re-open, it is likely
they would also drop (a polite word for crash).
US Dollar |
Gold
|
Oil |
Dow Jones
Ind |
Macro
bad – Micro good
While this is a terrible scenario, it doesn’t have to be for
wise investors. Smart investors can take advantage of much of what
is going on through strategic asset allocation and a flexible strategy.
The average
Wall Street portfolio will suffer tremendous losses if this scenario
plays out, with heavy losses in both the stock and bond markets.
But investors
heavy in gold, commodities, (especially oil and agricultural commodities),
and market hedges should not only be protected but profit from the
worst case scenario. Investors that have hedged the US Dollar should
also see profits from a collapse of the Dollar. And even if the
foreign markets fall, say 20%, if the Dollar drops 25%, a US investor
in foreign markets profits.
Investors that
can’t construct this type of portfolio on their own or have
the ability to manage their assets through a crisis like this should
look to a professional money manager that has a real strategy for
a bear market. Look for someone that has a proven track record of
beating the markets over the past several years by avoiding following
the Wall Street crowd.
You can see
Cornerstone’s Model Portfolio here: CIS
Model Portfolio
You will see that it has beaten the markets this year and over the
past several years with a very low risk (Beta) You will also see
that the asset allocation is vastly different than anything Wall
Street would utilize and is prepared for what is likely to come
in the next several months and years. Our strategy is proactive.
It appears to us that most money managers on Wall Street are reactive.
They wait until it is too late in many cases.
Do we think
the Worst Case Scenario will happen? It may not. But recent events
tell us it is better to be prepared than surprised. We would rather
not wait to see if it happens, would you?
|